Alpecin's Gent-Wevelgem template — Van der Poel pulls the dangerous moves forward, the chase exhausts trying to bring it back, Philipsen wins the bunch. Worked again.
Cycling Results · Post-Race Analysis · Édition 2026
Gent-Wevelgem
2026
Philipsen out-sprinted a reduced bunch in Wevelgem after the late Van der Poel / Van Aert / Segaert move was caught in the final hundred metres. A pure Alpecin-Premier Tech result on the right finish for the right rider, with Tobias Lund Andresen second and Laporte third for Visma's day.
Tracked riders in this race
Late Van der Poel / Van Aert move caught — Philipsen finishes the day
OPENING240.8 km from Middelkerke to Wevelgem, multiple Kemmelberg laps with the Ossuaire turn-off. A standard Gent-Wevelgem early break that the favourites' teams kept on a manageable leash.
UNFOLDSOn the final Kemmelberg passage, a trio of Van der Poel, Van Aert, and the under-twenty-three Belgian Alec Segaert went clear. The chase took most of the run-in to assemble; the gap stayed dangerous until the final two kilometres.
DECIDEDThe bunch caught the three-man move with under 500 metres to go. Once it was a sprint, the result was Alpecin's: Philipsen has won Gent-Wevelgem before from exactly this scenario, and Van der Poel — having spent his energy on the break — was always going to leave it to him.
FINALELund Andresen got the surprise second after a clean Decathlon lead-out gave him space; Laporte was Visma's salvage card for third, the same role he'd play two weeks later at Roubaix to keep Van Aert in position.
Where the race tilted
-
Van der Poel / Van Aert / Segaert go clearThe day's defining attack came on the last Kemmelberg passage. Three riders bridged into a gap that nearly held.
-
Bunch catches at 500 mThe chase organised late and absorbed the three-man move with metres to go, setting up a reduced-group sprint that Philipsen's sprint engine was always favourite to win.
Who pressed, who missed
Van Aert was in the three-man late move with Van der Poel and Segaert, taking the same kind of long-shot that won him Roubaix two weeks later. Caught with metres to go; Laporte then sprinted to third from the catch, his second podium of the spring.
How each story played out
Won the bunch sprint after Van der Poel's three-man move was caught in the final 500 metres. Repeat performance on the race that suits him better than any other Belgian classic.
- 0.2 kmWon bunch sprint after late catch
Joined the late three-up move with Van Aert and Segaert on the final Kemmelberg. Caught at 500 m; gave Philipsen the bunch sprint scenario that wins more often than not.
- 35 kmMade the late three-man move on the Kemmelberg
Joined Van der Poel and Segaert in the late move. Caught at 500 m. Visma's salvage came from Laporte's sprint for third behind.
- 35 kmBridged onto Van der Poel's move on the final Kemmelberg
Held in the bunch for the late catch but couldn't match Philipsen's sprint engine. Outside the top placings.
Bunch sprint after a late catch
Gent-Wevelgem went exactly as it usually goes when Van der Poel and Philipsen line up together. The leader pulls the dangerous moves; the sprinter wins the bunch when the moves are caught. Van Aert's reading of the late attack — bridging to the three-up — was identical to the Roubaix-winning move two weeks later. Same instincts, different race outcome.
Where this analysis comes from
- 🇬🇧 Cyclingnews — Philipsen wins Gent-Wevelgem 2026
- 🇬🇧 ProCyclingStats — Gent-Wevelgem 2026 result